BREAKING – Insight Says No to Anti-McConnell Ad

Senator Mitch McConnell used his clout with Insight Communications to have ads targeting him pulled from the air.

While the commercial incorrectly alleged that McConnell voted against funding for body armor, it’s not reason enough in our minds to have it pulled. Not after Insight has run despicable and factually incorrect ads supporting the slaughter in Iraq.

The ad is still running on broadcast stations throughout Kentucky, including tonight’s NFL opener on NBC affiliates.

It’s interesting to note that McConnell has received $17,000 in campaign contributions from Insight employees.

See?

ABBOT, JOHN F
NEW YORK,NY 10280
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/CFO
3/30/2007
$2,000

BRECHER, ELLIOT MR
NEW YORK,NY 10019
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/GENERAL COUN
9/25/2006
$1,000

DIETZ, CHARLES E
ORADELL,NJ 07649
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/VP
3/30/2007
$2,000

HALL, KEITH
SIMPSONVILLE,KY 40067
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/SENIOR VICE
10/14/2005
$2,000

HALL, KEITH
NEW YORK,NY 10044
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS
1/15/2002
$1,000

HALL, KEITH MR
SIMPSONVILLE,KY 40067
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/SENIOR VICE
9/25/2006
$2,000

HALL, KEITH MR
SIMPSONVILLE,KY 40067
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/SENIOR VICE
9/25/2006
$1,900

HALL, KEITH MR
SIMPSONVILLE,KY 40067
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/SENIOR VICE
9/25/2006
($1,900)

KNAFEL, SIDNEY MR
NEW YORK,NY 10019
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/CHAIRMAN
9/25/2006
$2,000

KNAFEL, SIDNEY R
NEW YORK,NY 10019
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/CHAIRMAN
3/30/2007
$2,000

KNAFEL, SIDNEY R
NEW YORK,NY 10019
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/CHAIRMAN
3/30/2007
$1,700

KNAFEL, SIDNEY R
NEW YORK,NY 10019
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/CHAIRMAN
3/30/2007
($1,700)

WILLNER, MICHAEL
NEW YORK,NY 10019
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS
1/13/2002
$1,000

WILLNER, MICHAEL MR
NEW YORK,NY 10019
INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS/PRESIDENT AN
9/25/2006
$2,000

Hard not to think McConnell’s direct influence wasn’t taken advantage of in this situation.

A representative from Public Campaign Action Fund tells Page One that Insight neither notified them of this decision nor gave them a chance to respond to/argue re: why they think their facts are accurate.

Patently false?

McConnell’s camp says attack ads being run in primetime slots are full of it. (Please watch the ad and read this article so you know what we’re talking about.)

Mitchypoo’s camp neglects to mention that Hunter Bates was McConnell’s COS, left to become a lobbyist using his Mitch connection (see John Cheves’ mind-blowing series from last fall), got a $200K contract to promote an earmark to send Chinese-made iPod-like devices to Afghanistan. McConnell delivered and Bates went to work raising $120K for his campaign.

While we hate what’s happened and the way Senator McConnell is trying to cover it up? We won’t swallow talking points hook, line and sinker, we’re not going to attack the following factual statement from Ryan Alessi:

While the ad doesn’t cite any source for the claim that McConnell voted against providing funding for body armor, an independent political watchdog group Factcheck.org declared a similar accusation against other Republican senators last fall as false.

The ad does not cite a source for the claim that McConnell voted against providing funding for body armor. To parse words and get semantic? On October 2, 2003 McConnell voted to table an ammendment that was to be attached to an $87 billion emergency supplemental bill. (Reference: Vote 376, S.Amdt. 1817 to S. 1689) While despicable, obscene, hate-filled, possibly murderous and typically McConnell, let’s be accurate here. McConnell voted to table an amendment (like he did in April 2003). He didn’t vote for or against something that was up for a vote to become law.

That said, McConnell’s lackeys are full of shit. They’re parsing words to obscure facts. They’re challenging the semantics about what the devices were called. E.G., Public Campaign Action Fund called them “music players” in order to describe what they are, not just what they do. They could have called them iPod-like devices or MP3 players, but McConnell probably would have found fault in any of those descriptions as well. They’re attempting to obscure the fact that he lined up a contract to send $8.3million worth of Chinese-made players to Afghanistan (to spread right-wing talking points) and got $120,000 from the lobbyist’s clients.