Page One header image 1

Speaking Of Progress Kentucky’s Shawn Reilly And Other Problems…

April 11th, 2013 · 25 Comments

This is the first installment in a multi-part series exploring the public career of Democratic Party operative Shawn Reilly who has found his way into the center of a number of scandals surrounding his Super PAC, Progress Kentucky. What began as an investigation into an insensitive tweet attacking the racial heritage of Senator Mitch McConnell’s wife – and the potential role the folks behind that Twitter account might have played in the secret audio recording made in McConnell’s campaign office – has turned into something far more dark than the usual story of a political operative run amok.

. . .

In October 2003, Louisville was shaken to its core when 20-year-old Zachary Scarpellini was gunned down outside his Highlands apartment. The tony and quiet neighborhood of victorian mansions – home to residents like Ambassador Matthew Barzun and prominent businessman-turned-politician Bruce Lunsford – was rattled awake by gunfire, left terrified and in shock over such a violent crime.

The only witness at the scene other than the alleged gunman was Scarpellini’s roommate, Shawn Reilly, now Executive Director of Progress Kentucky. Reilly’s claim at the time of the crime was that he and Scarpellini were merely following someone they thought was breaking into cars. According to a report in the Bellarmine University (where Scarpellini was a student) newspaper, The Concord, investigators believed the shooting was random and the victim did not know his killer.

It would take years for the full story to unfold but local media were at the time focused like lasers.

WLKY:

Police: Man Shot Dead After Confronting Break-In Suspect

Victim, Friend Thought Shooter Was Breaking Into Cars

A man reportedly trying to stop another man from breaking into vehicles was shot dead over the weekend, police said.

Zachary Scarpellini, 20, was shot several times on Longest Avenue in the Highlands early Sunday morning, WLKY NewsChannel 32 reported.

According to investigators, Scarpellini and a friend were following a man who they believed was breaking into vehicles when a argument ensued. That’s when the suspect reportedly pulled out a gun and shot the victim. Scarpellini collapsed and died a short distance away on Cherokee Road.

Lexington Herald-Leader:

MAN FOLLOWS THEFT SUSPECT, THEN IS FATALLY SHOT

A Jefferson County man was shot to death early Sunday after confronting a man he thought was breaking into vehicles near his home, Louisville Metro Police said. Zachary Scarpellini, 20, died from a gunshot wound to his chest, Jefferson County Deputy Coroner Jim Wesley said. However, the victim had been shot multiple times, Wesley said.

-SNIP-

When the victim and his friend confronted the man, he shot Scarpellini several times and fled. His friend was not injured, Smiley said. The confrontation occurred about 1:30 a.m.

The ensuing death investigation dragged on for months, leading to a press conference held by the Scarpellini Family on Zachary’s birthday in March 2004. The family, distraught in their grief, offered a cash reward for information.

From WAVE3/Associated Press – March 27, 2004:

Parents Of Man Shot To Death In Louisville Offer Reward

The parents of a college student who was shot to death last fall announced a $10,000 reward in the case on what would have been their son’s 21st birthday.

The case has gone unsolved since Zachary Scarpellini was killed Oct. 12, and Al and Denise Scarpellini made a plea Friday for information leading to an arrest and conviction.

“Somebody has to know something,” Al Scarpellini said at a news conference. “These crimes don’t happen in a vacuum.”

After nearly two years of investigating, the family/estate of Scarpellini named Reilly in a civil complaint. The allegation was that Reilly and others had information about the murder that wasn’t being shared with police. This was filed in November 2005:


An excerpt:

3. That on or about October 12, 2003, the Plaintiff’s decedent was killed and/or murdered by the criminal use of a firearm by unknown Defendant(s) at or near the intersection of Cherokee Road and Longest Avenue, Louisville, Jefferson County, Kentucky.

4. That the Plaintiff is of the opinion that the Defendant(s), Shawn Reilly, may have conspired with the unknown Defendant(s) to commit said act, or willfully aided, and/or abetted, in the commission of the act involving the use of a firearm, all deemed unlawful by virtue of KRS 411.155.

5. That on or about October 12, 2003, the negligent, careless, and/or intended conduct of the Defendant, Shawn Reilly, was a substantial factor in causing or bringing about the death of Plaintiff’s decedent.

6. That if the above allegations be proven true, then the Plaintiff states that the Defendant, Shawn Reilly, and the unknown Defendant(s) acted with such intentional malice and/or extreme and reckless conduct and/or indifference for the safety of Plaintiff’s decedent at all times material herein, that the Defendant, Shawn Reilly, and unknown Defendant(s) are liable for punitive damages.

Reilly, who says he moved to South Carolina after the murder to attend school, either did not respond to the lawsuit or was unable to be located. That led to a request for a Special Bailiff to serve him with the complaint. According to the affidavit, Reilly was believed to have had information law enforcement needed and was allegedly working to evade questions.


An excerpt:

Comes now the affiant, who after being duly sworn states that he/she is the Plaintiff’s attorney in the above styled action. Affiant further states that they believe that process of this action cannot be executed unless a Special Bailiff is appointed due to one or more of the following reasons:

[X] Defendant has prior knowledge of this action and it is believed that they have evaded or will evade service by the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office.

[X] The exact address of the Defendant is unknown and service will prove difficult.

[X] The Defendant has evaded service attempts through certified mail.

[X] The Defendant is in and out of the residence frequently and service will prove difficult.

A few weeks later, Reilly surfaced in Louisville on a Congressional campaign staff.

You won’t believe the rest.

Tune in tomorrow for Part Two of the story…

UPDATE: Click here for Part 2.

Tags: Investigation · Mitch McConnell · Senate

25 responses so far ↓

  • 1 marcus // Apr 11, 2013 at 3:02 pm

    wow! i will be back tomorrow for sure. thanks and great work!

  • 2 CitizenEgg // Apr 11, 2013 at 3:12 pm

    This appears to be some interesting stuff. Looking forward to tomorrow’s installment.

  • 3 Gil // Apr 11, 2013 at 4:33 pm

    Wow. Wow. And wow!

  • 4 Debbie Linnig Michals // Apr 11, 2013 at 5:04 pm

    Great reporting…something smells rotten when it comes to Shawn Reilly….he gives me the creeps.

  • 5 Beverly Glascock // Apr 11, 2013 at 5:36 pm

    Good research, Jake! I knew something wasn’t quite right with this guy when he started stalking me on the internet last spring.

  • 6 jake // Apr 11, 2013 at 7:03 pm

    This isn’t about Shawn Reilly being good or bad and I don’t wish to malign anyone’s character.

    But the background on this story needs to be told.

  • 7 jake // Apr 11, 2013 at 7:20 pm

    P.S. There are about 50 folks attempting to leave comments suggesting that we’re claiming Reilly is a murderer. What on earth?!

    The guy was a witness to his friend’s death. To claim we’re suggesting otherwise is absurd and some people need to get a grip.

    This is only the first part of a multi-part series, not some personal attack on anyone.

  • 8 John Q Public // Apr 12, 2013 at 7:37 am

    Beverly,

    No one and I mean no one has stalked you on the internet. You are an internet paranoid delusional drama queen. Which is likely why you got fired from your last law firm.
    You are good for a laugh though, and by that I mean someone to laugh at.

  • 9 Yoshi Padilla // Apr 12, 2013 at 8:05 am

    Interesting. I wonder what Shawn Reilly’s take on the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin case is. Seems like he might have an unique perspective.

  • 10 Steve // Apr 12, 2013 at 8:23 am

    Page One continues to lead the others in investigative reporting. That is why I am a daily reader.

  • 11 Beverly Glascock // Apr 12, 2013 at 8:56 am

    John Q (aka Shawn Reilly) – you might want to check your facts before you go posting public comments. In the meantime, we’ll see who has the last laugh on this one.

  • 12 Brian simpson // Apr 12, 2013 at 9:22 am

    I just hope that Curtis doesn’t get hung out to dry for this. Didnt take long for his “buddy” to spin and put all the blame on him. Hopefully it will blow over in time.

  • 13 John Q Public // Apr 12, 2013 at 9:46 am

    Beverly,

    Im not that idiot Shawn Reilly either. You are providing more proof to my assertion you are a paranoid internet drama queen.
    Such a fun little nut ball to watch.

  • 14 Abbie // Apr 12, 2013 at 10:49 am

    John Q Public you sound pretty scary and creepy.

  • 15 FreeManNKy // Apr 12, 2013 at 10:54 am

    Curtis seems like a “Patsy.”

  • 16 Manfred Mann // Apr 12, 2013 at 12:43 pm

    John Q Public likes to watch her?? But he assures her she’s never been stalked. Thanks John Q for clarifying that and for showing us all that you’re as much an idiot as Shawn boy.

  • 17 Politico // Apr 12, 2013 at 2:11 pm

    Very interesting, Jake. Thanks for your reporting.

  • 18 Sandy Knauer // Apr 12, 2013 at 3:30 pm

    Anyone else laughing at the person who uses John Q Public instead of a real name expecting others to believe him/her?

    I share Brian Simpson’s hope that Curtis doesn’t get stuck with the blame.

  • 19 Manfred Mann // Apr 12, 2013 at 5:25 pm

    Looking forward to installment 3 too. By the way, I dont know much about Reilly’s wife but I understand her sister is roomies with Curt Morrison.

  • 20 John Q Public // Apr 12, 2013 at 5:46 pm

    Manfred,

    Yes because watching someone’s ridiculous assertions publicly posted on an internet forum is exactly the same as stalking. Idiot.

  • 21 Abbie // Apr 12, 2013 at 6:09 pm

    Yes, John Q Public you’re the one we’re all laughing at. Why don’t you use your real name? Is it because its so much easier to throw mud when you’re hiding behind a fake name? Coward.

  • 22 Manfred Mann // Apr 12, 2013 at 6:14 pm

    John Q Public you just proved Beverly’s point. You really are an idiot.

  • 23 John Q Public // Apr 12, 2013 at 8:43 pm

    Manfred,

    Dear moron, please research what constitutes stalking. Again since you seem to be so slow on the uptake, reading her publicly posted comments here on Page One doesnt constitute stalking.

    And as a public figure no I dont use my real name. Until this website requires it I will post using an anonymous pseudonym as I see fit. Dont like it? Go cry in your pillow.

  • 24 Manfred Mann // Apr 12, 2013 at 9:01 pm

    Well if you’re spending so much time watching someone make ridiculous assertions on the internet, then you need to get a life. Oh, but you’re a “public figure”! That changes everything. Let me guess – you’re the wizard of oz?

  • 25 Debbie Linnig Michals // Apr 12, 2013 at 11:12 pm

    John Q Public, the others are correct, you are a coward. I for one want to know who you are so I can work against you next time. I have never met Ms. Glasscock but you talked so rudely to her.

    Jake, I am very proud of you, keep up the great reporting.