Comments on: Let The Rand Paul/David Adams Spin Begin

By: bestmid

bestmid — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:04:38 +0000

Sad sad sad…a plethora of candidates for senator, mayor and governor of the great commonwealth of Kentucky and there isn’t a set of balls between ‘em.

Candidates of reason and intelligence show up every chance they get. Weak puppets use excuses to avoid real debate.

Nothing to see here. Move on.

By: wondering

wondering — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:53:16 +0000

If candidates are supposed to avoid forums with perceived bias, then Republicans would never sit for interviews with the C-J and H-L editorial boards.

By: jake

jake — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:51:49 +0000

Further – if they thought the moderator was biased? They could have made precautionary statements during the event to prevent any problems.

By: Noah

Noah — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:45:50 +0000

When will folks understand Paul is as much establishment, if not more, than Grayson. They just come from different establishments. Grayson comes from the establishment of civil discussion and civic duty (as evidenced by his involvement in numerous charitable and community organizations). Paul comes from a chip-on-the-shoulder establishment that fears everyone and a network which his father has cultivated for decades.

By: AttentionWhore

AttentionWhore — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:33:40 +0000

Jake,

I consider a Paultard a blind follower of Ron Paul. I’m pretty sure David Adams is a Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney type.

By: J. R.

J. R. — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:29:14 +0000

If you think a moderator is biased, that’s not an excuse to back out. You do the debate anyways. There will never be any debate or discussion if everyone backed out of a debate when terms weren’t friendly towards them. Complete impartiality is a myth. He couneeds a better scheduler. Whoever thought 2 and a half hours was enough time to give a speech and drive from Owensboro to Louisville isn’t being very realistic.

By: jake

jake — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:26:17 +0000

You don’t get to have your cake and eat it, too.

So which is it? Is he a Paultard or isn’t he? David is no spring chicken and didn’t fall off any truck recently. If he was backing out – and not playing petty, bitter politics which he doth protest – because a contributor to Grayson was involved in a forum that asked all candidates the same questions and gave them opportunities to respond, then, uh, I’m pretty darn sure David would have and could have done so a couple months ago?

By: oh really?

oh really? — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:25:03 +0000

that pic looks like rand has mousse and squirrel in his hair :)

By: AttentionWhore

AttentionWhore — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:09:49 +0000

No, I think the Paultards don’t trust the establishment. This clearly was the establishment sitting up their boy Trey for a photo-op.

Remember Adams isn’t a Paultard so he probably was slow to pick up on the establishment trap.

If you google this lady Randy doesn’t like that donated to Grayson. Besides her being a Grayson donor, you’ll find she was one of the establishment that went to the RNC with Trey in 2008. You ‘ll also find she never misses a derby and always have 450 bucks for a new hat!

By: Not_A_WATB

Not_A_WATB — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:07:16 +0000

Hey AttentionWhore,

Trey Grayson had no problem attending the Paducah debate which was set up by known Paultards.

In fact, you can find the organizers in all their Paultard glory here: http://conservativehippiechick.blogspot.com/

Why doesn’t Rand Paul man up and stop picking on 85 year old women and participate in the debate?