Joe published this yesterday, but take a look again:
That’s right. It’s Daniel Mongiardo openly telling you where he stands on womens issues. According to folks who were there, Lt. Dan raised his hand on two separate times to admit he was pro-life.
Shocking that this would make it to the internets, isn’t it?
26 responses so far ↓
1 Thunder Storm // Nov 20, 2009 at 5:19 pm
GREAT.
Dan is not for sucking the brains out of babies while there legs and arms are kicking about
2 briansmith // Nov 20, 2009 at 10:37 pm
wow. since you put it that way…
3 Terri // Nov 20, 2009 at 11:14 pm
Shorter Thunder Storm: SSPTP!
4 Thunder Storm // Nov 21, 2009 at 2:15 am
Terri ???? SSPTP ????
I’m glad Mongiardo manned up for unborn children. He didn’t look around the room before he voted. He put his arm up with conviction.
What revolts you more?
Keep this image in your head.
The baby is out of the birth canal, outside the mothers body except for the baby’s head. Tiny arms and legs flailing about begging to be brought into this cruel world.
Then a doctor jabs a huge needle into the back of the moving baby’s head sucking out the baby’s brain. The baby is now dead.
Or
Someone throwing a kitty out a moving car window, or starving their dog?
People get more pissed off if an animal is abused than a baby being aborted. What’s wrong with us?
5 kelly // Nov 21, 2009 at 11:52 am
doesn’t this prove Virgina Woodward a fraud. The self-queen endorses an ANTI-Choice candidate?
6 finally truth on the rightwing // Nov 21, 2009 at 11:55 am
Everyone already knows, Kathy Groob, Jordan, Woodward, …
7 Dino // Nov 21, 2009 at 1:55 pm
Good for Mongiardo, he has my vote
8 Taylor // Nov 21, 2009 at 4:03 pm
SSPTP: “sluts should pay the price”
9 johndoe // Nov 21, 2009 at 9:55 pm
Republican for six years had control of congress and the president did they ever bring up abortion,not one time because that what they have used for a wedge issue to get elected , now the dem’s are doing it, maybe they should have left it in the back alleys,and Dr. office and that just called it a DNC
10 Thunder Storm // Nov 21, 2009 at 10:16 pm
Johndoe,
When was the last time you heard or read of an abortion being performed in a back alley or with coat hangers?
If anything like that took place, it would be on the web in minutes. Those kind of scare tactics of things that occurred decades ago carry no weight with the general public. Its not going on now and federal dollars are not used for abortions and it won’t start no matter how the heath care bill ends up in its congressional vote.
11 johndoe // Nov 21, 2009 at 10:21 pm
Thunder Storm
just saying that was the way it was done in the 50’s 60’s do we want to go back doing it that way.
and yes I’m that old
12 Jeff // Nov 22, 2009 at 12:03 am
Thunder Storm is implementing the propaganda techniques of disinformation, half-truths and oversimplification. The procedure Thunder describes was performed for only 0.17% of all abortions (in the year 2000) and has, in fact, been outlawed. The purpose of propaganda is to blow smoke & obfuscate, thereby skewing subsequent dialog. Propaganda is diametrically opposed to truth & honestly and should be carefully analyzed when interpreting communication.
13 briansmith // Nov 22, 2009 at 12:35 am
The propaganda extends to the way they choose to name this particular medical procedure: “partial birth abortion”. It’s a political term, not a medical term.
“People get more pissed off if an animal is abused than a baby being aborted. What’s wrong with us?”
People get pretty pissed off about someone with your set of beliefs who walks into a church and kills a doctor in front of his wife. And is then treated as a folk hero.
Keep this image in your head.
14 Thunder Storm // Nov 22, 2009 at 1:28 am
for you guys, the abortions can continue, the question is will your fed tax dollars pay for them. what would be the criteria? is there any?
Abortions at will? I guess its good population control
15 E // Nov 22, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Today the average price of an abortion is $468.19….National Network of Abortion Funds, “Abortion Funding: A Matter of Justice,” 2005, p. 6.
I’m pro-life…however…with regard to the question of taxpayer funded abortions, we’re talking about a $1.50 a day (per year) that those who would terminate an inconvenient baby are attempting to forego, and in essence force taxpayers to fund.
The current law of the land is, that abortions are legal. If those who choose to have the consequences of their actions alleviated by terminating the life of a fetus (”little one”), absolving themselves of the long term responsibility for their actions…then at least, please, set aside a few dollars…and pay for it yourself.
Isn’t it enough that the fetus pays the ultimate price? Must you also force the taxpayers to participate?
On a tangent…I wonder where this debate will end up as modern medicine/science advances to the point to where specific physical and behavioral traits can be reasonably predicted. Will terminations be used to eliminate fetuses with a predisposition to frailty, disability, or even sexual orientation?
Female fetuses are already selectively terminated in other countries, based on cultural preferences…so don’t think it can’t happen.
Beware the slippery slope of unintended consequences.
16 kentondem1 // Nov 22, 2009 at 1:35 pm
News Flash: Thunder Storm is bad mouthing
“scare tactics” by the left , at 10:16.
Sure glad he didn’t use them himself in his very first comment on this Post.
Well maybe not so much.
17 briansmith // Nov 22, 2009 at 2:13 pm
who’s paying for your boner pills, E? I’m morally opposed to conservatives having recreational sex.
18 Bimbeau // Nov 22, 2009 at 6:32 pm
One way to end the debate is to ask the mothers of Thunderstorm, E, etc if they’d had the option of termination or gestation - which would they have chosen?
My guess … from the hatred spewing forth …
termination!
.
19 E // Nov 22, 2009 at 7:27 pm
Brian…don’t need them…but if I did…I would pay for them myself.
I must say it’s somewhat unexpected , that you show such interest in my genetalia.
Bimbeau…I’d be glad to give you her contact information…you can ask her yourself. I know the answer.
So…suggesting that someone/anyone (male or female) assume a modicum of responsibility for their actions…to pay for the services that would absolve them of the inevitable result their actions…is hatred.
Am I to suppose that the crude suggestion (on your part) that my mother would have opted for termination is somehow not filled with hatred?
I’ve at no point gone so far as to wish someone dead. Bimbeau…you’re better than that…or so I thought.
20 Thunder Storm // Nov 22, 2009 at 7:53 pm
A bigger uproar came about when it was learned that our soldiers put underwear on the head of an enemy soldier or made him strip naked than anything like the vile being spewed at me from a few posters.
One even wishes me and another DEAD! My God, what is wrong with some of you?
Fareed Zakaria GPS profiled ONE journalist captured and kept in one of the worst prisons on the planet. He’s free now thanks to the pressure and weight of the United State Government and Sec. of State Hillary Clinton on Iran.
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/fareed.zakaria.gps/
60 Minutes is doing a story at this exact moment of the same guy and his story will be the cover story of Newsweek
Briansmith, the murder of the any doctor is wrong, I agree 100% but so is the abortions of tens of thousands babies.
21 Thunder Storm // Nov 22, 2009 at 7:56 pm
Hit enter to early..
Fareed Zakaria GPS profiled ONE journalist captured and kept in one of the worst prisons on the planet. He’s free now thanks to the pressure and weight of the United State Government and Sec. of State Hillary Clinton on Iran.
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/fareed.zakaria.gps/
60 Minutes is doing a story at this exact moment of the same guy and his story will be the cover story of Newsweek
But no pressure to end abortions.
22 MarshallDem // Nov 22, 2009 at 9:39 pm
Do your research Jake. Conway’s position in 2002 was against abortion if the mother’s life was in danger!!!!!! Google it if you don’t believe!!!!!
23 jake // Nov 23, 2009 at 8:28 am
It’s 2009.
Did you watch the video?
Jack Conway did not raise his hand.
24 Conservative // Nov 23, 2009 at 9:17 am
One way to end the debate is to ask the mother of Dimbulb/Bimbeau/Old Scout if she’d had the option of termination or gestation - which would she have chosen?
My guess … from the hatred spewing forth …
termination!
There, I fixed it for you.
The time for deciding whether or not you want to have a baby is before sex, not after.
25 briansmith // Nov 23, 2009 at 11:01 am
I would like to thank all the conservatives for their continuing support of the nanny state. Your holier-than-thou scoldings. moralizing and fishwifery help advance the liberal agenda of total government control over our private lives and health care.
26 Mark H (Not Hebert) // Nov 23, 2009 at 11:26 am
Oh the abortion date……
I am pro choice, but the here is the hypocritical pro-choice trap that I fall into myself:
If my wife and I have been trying for months or years to get pregnant, only to have a drunk driver hit our car leaving our first ultrasound visit, photo images in hand to finally show-off family friends.
The accident results in the death of the 3-month old fetus that we have been trying so hard to conceive. I would want that driver to be punished for that death.
The trap that I don’t have the answer to is really simple. If you want a child, it’s a fetus, if you don’t, it’s a mass of cells.
Leave a Comment