Comments on: Rand Paul Accepts Support of Racist Group

By: Terri

Terri — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:31:02 +0000

And while I don’t assume all Paul supporters think we shouldn’t have repealed slavery or given women the right to vote, it does make me raise an eyebrow about the rest of them.

Oh, not publicly, at least. Or they’ll wrap it up in the warm-fuzzies of states’ rights…

By: jake

jake — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:13:44 +0000

Then what would Marty Cockring do all day?

He’s gotta have something to be obsessed with.

By: Conservative

Conservative — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:07:35 +0000

I have one of the largest dork pulpits in the Commonwealth.

Can’t they cure that with surgery or something?

By: tbrauch

tbrauch — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:52:07 +0000

I’ve had two different Paul supports on two different occassions over the last week tell me that the 13th & 19th amendments to the US Constitution were unnecessary and unconstitutional (how part of the Constitution can be unconstitutional is beyond me).

And while I don’t assume all Paul supporters think we shouldn’t have repealed slavery or given women the right to vote, it does make me raise an eyebrow about the rest of them.

By: curtis morrison

curtis morrison — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:57:45 +0000

It’s interesting that his campaign hasn’t issued a denial- It would only take a second, and I’m sure the coned-hat crowd would understand it was the white thing to do.

One has to wonder though, how someone can have 4,792 facebook friends, only 5 are African American. Because we all know African Americans only make up .00104% of the total Kentucky population, right?

By: jake

jake — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:47:01 +0000

It would be far more entertaining.

Now shorten it down (20 seconds in I was bored– and there’s some juicy content there) to something under a minute and don’t have such long, complicated breaks and I’ll whore it out for you.

Make it palatable for short internets attention spans and it’ll be a hit.

By: Rod

Rod — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:31:31 +0000

Jake, think this would be far more entertaining.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4O4E3lGs248

By: briansmith

briansmith — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:28:37 +0000

does the Rand campaign know you are speaking for them?

By: briansmith

briansmith — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:53:30 +0000

yeah. attack a democratic opponent for expressing his opposition as a law enforcement official to reinstating the federal semi-automatic firearms ban. that will play well at Knob Creek.

By: jake

jake — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:13:58 +0000

Haha! Took a total of four minutes for his actions to speak louder than his words.

Cute.

They always take the bait.

(And at this point… any support for Jack Conway is good support. If you make the wingnuts believe they should support Jack over Lt. Dan? You’re just hurting your own candidate. Because Jack’s the only Democrat who can beat Ro… Rand Paul.)