<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RUH RO: Daniel Mongiardo Steps In It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/</link>
	<description>an informed, savvy take on media &#38; politics in Kentucky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:26:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bestmid</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/comment-page-1/#comment-64177</link>
		<dc:creator>bestmid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/#comment-64177</guid>
		<description>Millionaire politicians being self-serving hypocrites..wow... that IS news. 
Please Dr. Dan, say fuck it all and leave Kentucky alone. Pretty please? With ethics on top?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millionaire politicians being self-serving hypocrites..wow&#8230; that IS news.<br />
Please Dr. Dan, say fuck it all and leave Kentucky alone. Pretty please? With ethics on top?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/comment-page-1/#comment-64125</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/#comment-64125</guid>
		<description>Who is &quot;Breshear&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is &#8220;Breshear&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Germantown Rez</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/comment-page-1/#comment-64124</link>
		<dc:creator>Germantown Rez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/#comment-64124</guid>
		<description>I got the impression that Breshear originally was really a sort of &quot;stand-in&quot; during the last gubernatorial election, a place-holder, an &quot;acceptable&quot; Democrat who would reap the vote of all those who were turned off by Fletcher and/or Bush.  During his administration the Dems were expected to come up with a TRULY viable candidate, with name recognition and appeal, who actually wanted the job and would do amazing things for ALL Kentuckians (except David Williams).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the impression that Breshear originally was really a sort of &#8220;stand-in&#8221; during the last gubernatorial election, a place-holder, an &#8220;acceptable&#8221; Democrat who would reap the vote of all those who were turned off by Fletcher and/or Bush.  During his administration the Dems were expected to come up with a TRULY viable candidate, with name recognition and appeal, who actually wanted the job and would do amazing things for ALL Kentuckians (except David Williams).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/comment-page-1/#comment-64104</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/#comment-64104</guid>
		<description>YC...just in case you missed it...I wasn&#039;t saying the types of recordings (in the Dr Dan story) were illegal.  I suggested that telephone/electronic transmitted conversations were.  I was merely offering what I understood the laws to be to LG, who asked the question.
Geez...I certainly hope you&#039;re not a lawyer...as you missed that...and inferred a whole different meaning from  that which was obvious to everyone else.
[voting democrat is far easier that getting a job. keep it up.]  
Apparently you must have missed the part where I made the point that I couldn&#039;t vote dem...because I&#039;m not a registered dem...again...given your penchant for inferring what&#039;s not there and missing altogether what is...I sincerely hope no one has to count on your low powered perception to safeguard their rights...I sincerely hope you are NOT a lawyer, if you are...I sincerely hope you have a good paralegal that can READ for you, as you miss entirely too many obvious details.
I&#039;ll have to guess by your post about dems and jobs...you must think I&#039;m either a dem or a liberal...(that&#039;s funny).  Jake has called me an &quot;arch conservative&quot; at times...and I liked it!
I&#039;m a conservative that mocks the GOP for being too liberal, too lacking in thrift, and too inclined to encroach on our rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YC&#8230;just in case you missed it&#8230;I wasn&#8217;t saying the types of recordings (in the Dr Dan story) were illegal.  I suggested that telephone/electronic transmitted conversations were.  I was merely offering what I understood the laws to be to LG, who asked the question.<br />
Geez&#8230;I certainly hope you&#8217;re not a lawyer&#8230;as you missed that&#8230;and inferred a whole different meaning from  that which was obvious to everyone else.<br />
[voting democrat is far easier that getting a job. keep it up.]<br />
Apparently you must have missed the part where I made the point that I couldn&#8217;t vote dem&#8230;because I&#8217;m not a registered dem&#8230;again&#8230;given your penchant for inferring what&#8217;s not there and missing altogether what is&#8230;I sincerely hope no one has to count on your low powered perception to safeguard their rights&#8230;I sincerely hope you are NOT a lawyer, if you are&#8230;I sincerely hope you have a good paralegal that can READ for you, as you miss entirely too many obvious details.<br />
I&#8217;ll have to guess by your post about dems and jobs&#8230;you must think I&#8217;m either a dem or a liberal&#8230;(that&#8217;s funny).  Jake has called me an &#8220;arch conservative&#8221; at times&#8230;and I liked it!<br />
I&#8217;m a conservative that mocks the GOP for being too liberal, too lacking in thrift, and too inclined to encroach on our rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/comment-page-1/#comment-64092</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/#comment-64092</guid>
		<description>Folks in the Governor&#039;s office sent the audio my way a few days ago.

So I&#039;m not convinced it&#039;s a Paul supporter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks in the Governor&#8217;s office sent the audio my way a few days ago.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m not convinced it&#8217;s a Paul supporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thurston</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/comment-page-1/#comment-64091</link>
		<dc:creator>Thurston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/#comment-64091</guid>
		<description>young con-

where do you get the notion that these comments were made in a public forum?  because of the &quot;birds&quot; in the background?  or is it the &quot;crowded marketplace&quot; effect that someone layered over the recording?

haha, where the hell did you come from? straight from that wacko bland paul site that posted this thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>young con-</p>
<p>where do you get the notion that these comments were made in a public forum?  because of the &#8220;birds&#8221; in the background?  or is it the &#8220;crowded marketplace&#8221; effect that someone layered over the recording?</p>
<p>haha, where the hell did you come from? straight from that wacko bland paul site that posted this thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: young con</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/comment-page-1/#comment-64081</link>
		<dc:creator>young con</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/#comment-64081</guid>
		<description>E-

You&#039;re right:  You are not a lawyer.  The wiretap statute doesn&#039;t cover this type of intercept and it isn&#039;t necessary for all parties to consent.  Not to mention that these statements were made in a public forum, not on the phone.  

voting democrat is far easier that getting a job.  keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right:  You are not a lawyer.  The wiretap statute doesn&#8217;t cover this type of intercept and it isn&#8217;t necessary for all parties to consent.  Not to mention that these statements were made in a public forum, not on the phone.  </p>
<p>voting democrat is far easier that getting a job.  keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/comment-page-1/#comment-64073</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/#comment-64073</guid>
		<description>LeGardien...I&#039;m no lawyer, but I believe telephone intercepts fall under FCC regulations, as well I believe it is illegal to record from electronic transmissions unless all parties are aware of the recording (hence the disclaimer at the beginning of any call to a service center).

I&#039;ll not be able to vote in the primary unless I change my party affiliation...but if I were a dem, this would actually entice me to vote for Dr Dan.  How refreshing, a politician who doesn&#039;t NEED to be Senator.  I&#039;d fear a probable career politician much more than I&#039;d fear a &#039;potty mouth&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LeGardien&#8230;I&#8217;m no lawyer, but I believe telephone intercepts fall under FCC regulations, as well I believe it is illegal to record from electronic transmissions unless all parties are aware of the recording (hence the disclaimer at the beginning of any call to a service center).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll not be able to vote in the primary unless I change my party affiliation&#8230;but if I were a dem, this would actually entice me to vote for Dr Dan.  How refreshing, a politician who doesn&#8217;t NEED to be Senator.  I&#8217;d fear a probable career politician much more than I&#8217;d fear a &#8216;potty mouth&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunchbox: Dr. Dan&#8217;s potty mouth - FatLip</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/comment-page-1/#comment-64057</link>
		<dc:creator>Lunchbox: Dr. Dan&#8217;s potty mouth - FatLip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/#comment-64057</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;close to saying fuck it all. I do not need this job. I do not need the U.S. Senate,&#8221; among other choice phrases. Profanity was turned into a campaign wedge issue by team Mongiardo when it criticized his chief [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;close to saying fuck it all. I do not need this job. I do not need the U.S. Senate,&#8221; among other choice phrases. Profanity was turned into a campaign wedge issue by team Mongiardo when it criticized his chief [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crutnacker</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/comment-page-1/#comment-64041</link>
		<dc:creator>Crutnacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2009/09/28/ruh-ro-daniel-mongiardo-steps-in-it/#comment-64041</guid>
		<description>Lorne Michaels clarified.  Dan meant &quot;frig&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorne Michaels clarified.  Dan meant &#8220;frig&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

