When will Martin Cothran realize he is eating out of the palm of our hand? He must not realize that it’s contagious.
Read his latest regurgitation from 1955:
I’ve gotten into the argument about gay pedophilia before, openly wondering how people like Jake can criticize the Catholic Church for doing too little to reprimand priests for sexually abusing children and at the same time totally ignoring the fact that most of the children abused by abusive male priests were boys. What you get a is a ludicrous response that such male on male sexual abuse doesn’t count as homosexual abuse.
Finally, you just realize that reason and fact just don’t matter to the gay rights crowd, and that all that matters is political ideology. Evidence has absolutely no role in their thinking about such things.
And, yes, there are some of us who are uncomfortable with putting children in the types of homes that have a demonstrably a high incidence of domestic abuse. If Jake disputes that this assertion also applies to gays, then his argument is not with me but with gay organizations that say it themselves.
To say that as a matter of state policy, we’re going to place children, many of whom have already been abused, in situations that lend themselves to abuse just so we can kowtow to gay rights groups is utterly and shamefully selfish.
Here’s a hint for Marty: When you’re making an argument, try not to prove us right by contradicting yourself.
And in other news… How hilarious is it that this closet case is pushing absolutely fabricated horse manure about the gays being more likely abuse children than heterosexual men?
He should educate himself with a fact or two.