Page One header image 1

ALERTA: Frank Simon Is Protecting Us!

February 25th, 2009 · 8 Comments

Dahaha. It never ends.

Poor old Frank Simon has sent out another email blast. This week he’s yammering on about five bills in the legislature that comprise the “General Assembly’s Covenant with Kentucky Families.” Haha. Really.

Let’s take a look at the fear he’s spreading:

SB 79 – The Ultrasound Bill - Requires abortionist to offer face-to-face consultation and availability of ultrasound for patient.

SB 42 – Public Decency Act - Bars total nudity in sex businesses and prevents patrons from groping/touching performers.

SB 1 – The CATS Test - Changes CATS test to family-friendly evaluation, not just school evaluation AND it saves millions.

SB 68 – Child Welfare in Adoption Act - Requires that child not be placed in the home of cohabiting, “live-in lovers.”

SB 186 – Special Needs Ed - Allows parents access to special needs funds when public school cannot meet the child’s needs.

Marriage Sovereignty Act - Protects marriage from an interloper who seduces the wife, then asks for paternity rights. (This is an issue currently – no bill number.)

Please also forward this email to as many as you can to let everyone know of the effort.

Like a favorite pal of ours said last night, we’re all looking for an “interloper” – bigots and weirdos need not apply.

Can’t. Stop. Laughing.

Tags: FEAR! · Humor · The Gays

8 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Nikky // Feb 25, 2009 at 11:31 am

    The Marriage Sovereignity Act protects marriage from an interloper who seduces the wife….

    REALLY???

    Most women get in their cars and meet interlopers at the hotel. Marriages are only as strong as the spouses in the marriage. It’s crazy to think women are any more innocent than husbands who cheat.

    Can’t wait to see how legislature will define seduce. Maybe Gary Tapp Tapp will sponsor a bill on the issue?

  • 2 jake // Feb 25, 2009 at 11:41 am

    I’d like for Jim Gooch to define it.

  • 3 Steve Bittenbender // Feb 25, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    So, if the good doctor feels so strongly that foster children shouldn’t be placed in the homes of “live-in lovers,” does he also support taking biological children out of similar environs?

  • 4 jake // Feb 25, 2009 at 1:13 pm

    Speaking of Frank, he still hasn’t told us how much he enjoyed rubbing his hands all over the back of a known homosexual in the year 2000.

  • 5 anon // Feb 25, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    I absolutely love how a woman who gets pregnant by someone other than her husband is the victim of an “interloper,” but if she gets pregnant while not married then she must be held accountable for her choice.

    Am I the only one who sees the hypocrisy in that?

  • 6 jake // Feb 25, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    Clearly, sluts should pay the price.

  • 7 anon // Feb 25, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    Exactly Jake, you see my point. And sluts should be treated equally, married or not. =P

  • 8 Polar // Feb 25, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    Nice to see that the Grand Wizzard of Madness and Doctor of Prejudice is at it again. I’d sure hate to see Witch Doctor Simon not get to suck money out of little old ladies and fellow Klansmen, just to publish his filth. I find it ironic that he is an allergist, since most people have a violent reaction to his ridiculous spew.

    As for Tapp’s bill, it had better die. If the above crepe passes, perhaps all of us should run for Senate or House seats. How low must one stoop to be in Kentucky General Assembly, anyway? How many brain cells must one lose, to be a Republican?

Leave a Comment