Page One header image 1

Bruce Lunsford Unveils 8-Point Energy Plan

July 24th, 2008 · 3 Comments

Democratic Senate candidate Bruce Lunsford held a press conference this afternoon to unveil his eight-point energy independence plan. Lunsford says the plan will provide both short-term relief and long-term solutions.

Here’s Lunsford’s plan from his press release. Let’s discuss.

Opening Up the Strategic Reserve. The Lunsford Plan would take a two-fold approach to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. It would continue the moratorium on putting new oil into the Reserve, as well as releasing barrels from the Reserve into the marketplace to lower gas prices. This could put up to 50 million barrels of oil back into supply, which would have an impact on prices. In the past, America has tapped the SPR which resulted in a dramatic decrease in price. [Energy Information Administration; New York Times, 9/23/00; Center For American Progress, “Sell Oil From The Strategic Petroleum Reserve To Lower Prices,” 6/13/08]

Fully Closing The “Enron Loophole.” The “Enron loophole” allows hedge funds, investment banks, and other Wall Street speculators to secretly buy and sell oil contracts. It is named after Enron, the notorious energy trading company, which pushed for a provision that kept energy trading off of regulated exchanges, evading speculation limits and accountability. Experts, including oil executives and economists, say that speculation trading has potentially increased oil prices by as much $40 per barrel, or $1 per gallon of gas. The Lunsford Plan would fully clamp down on Wall Street traders who are driving up oil prices in search of paper profits and bring more accountability to energy trading. [Congressional Quarterly Weekly, 4/12/08; Business Week Online, 5/14/08; Detroit Free Press, 10/31/07; Dr. Mark Cooper, Testimony Before Senate Commerce, Science, And Transportation Committee, 6/3/08]

Read the rest after the jump…

Providing A Gas Tax Holiday To Ease The Burden At The Pump. The Lunsford Plan would provide a gas tax holiday. The gas tax holiday concept, which is also supported by Sen. John McCain, would suspend the federal gas tax, which is currently $0.18 per gallon and $0.24 per gallon for diesel. For a car with a 15 gallon tank, this would mean saving about $2.70 with every fill up. For people who fill up twice a week, this would provide a savings of more than $280 a year. The gas tax holiday would remain as long as oilmen are running the White House, and Big Oil is writing America’s energy policy. Making oil companies pay their fair share of taxes through a windfall profits tax would offset the costs of lost revenue for vital infrastructure projects. [Associated Press, 7/8/08; Federal Highway Administration]

Protecting Consumers. The Lunsford Plan would provide stiffer penalties for companies caught price gouging to make sure Kentuckians are paying market price for gas. Similar to how Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway is investigating gas prices in Louisville and Jefferson County, the Lunsford Plan would make sure that Kentuckians aren’t being victimized by businesses that are knowingly breaking the law. [Louisville Courier-Journal, 7/4/08]

Requiring Oil Companies To Drill On Currently Leased Land. Oil companies are currently sitting on more than 68 million acres of land, both onshore and offshore, that is leased for drilling. That figure is more than 2.5 times the size of Kentucky. Yet these areas are undeveloped because drilling there would not yield high enough profits to maintain oil companies’ record earnings. The Lunsford Plan would follow Congressman John Yarmuth’s lead and compel oil companies to drill on existing leased areas. [Mineral Management Service; Congressman John Yarmuth Press Release, 6/12/08; Associated Press, 7/23/08]

Tapping Into Oil Shale Supply. America is potentially sitting on a trillion barrels of oil underground in oil shale, mainly located in parts of Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming. Analysts estimate that of this trillion, approximately 800 billion barrels could be recovered for commercial use, or more than three times the amount of oil in Saudi Arabia. If these reserves are tapped, the 800 billion barrels would go a long way towards easing the energy crisis. Plus, by using domestic sources America would not only reduce its dependence on foreign oil, but also boost its economy. This really is a win-win. [RAND Oil Shale Development In The United States, 2005; Energy Information Administration]

Promoting Kentucky Clean Coal As A Vital Part Of America’s Energy Plan. Kentucky is a national leader in coal, and as one of the nation’s top producers, with the right technologies, coal could be the key to America’s energy future. Currently, about half the nation’s electricity comes from coal. The Bush Administration recently backed off a major program piloting new clean coal technology, but under the Lunsford Plan, the federal government would increase clean coal research and development. There is also great possibility with coal-to-liquid technologies. Coal-to-liquid technology could directly ease Kentuckians’ pain at the pump. By converting coal to liquid fuel, the demand for oil would lessen, lowering gas prices. Plus, increasing coal use would boost Kentucky’s economy. From the miners, to the technicians, to the communities that it would support, boosting the coal industry is vital to Kentucky’s economic future. The Lunsford Plan would devote vital resources to not only improving technology, but also finding new, innovative uses for coal. [Energy Information Administration; Department of Energy; New York Times, 1/31/08]

Moving Towards Alternative And Renewable Energies. The Lunsford Plan would help move Kentucky, and America, towards alternative and renewable energies. The plan would invest in new research, while helping businesses and individuals become more energy independent. The plan would take several steps including:

  • Invest in government agencies, private businesses, and universities to research, develop, and commercialize alternative and renewable fuels.
  • Provide tax incentives to businesses for making their facilities more energy efficient, and using fuel efficient transportation, as well as investing in job training programs to allow workers and industries to make a smooth transition to cleaner fuel technology.
  • Encourage individuals to become more energy independent through incentives for hybrid vehicles and to make their homes energy efficient, as well as continuing to improve public transportation.

Tags: Economy · Senate · Environment · Mainstream · Bruce Lunsford

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Ditch Mitch KY | Ditch Mitch McConnell » Blog Archive » Quick Hits: Risk Exposure A-OK and Lunsford Has a Plan // Jul 24, 2008 at 7:26 pm

    […] Senate candidate Bruce Lunsford has unveiled a plan, and it involves more than beating on his chest and saying, […]

  • 2 Dean // Jul 25, 2008 at 11:08 am

    Here’s my take on Bruce’s ideas(for what it’s worth):

    Opening Up the Strategic Reserve
    Since the United States uses about 20 million barrels A DAY a 50 million dump, assuming that’s all, from these reserves would have a very limited impact. Other than maybe a feel good benefit to those who aren’t aware of the amounts involved. I guess you could say it’s better than doing nothing.
    Fully Closing The “Enron Loophole:
    I’m not sure of the full benefits of this one but from what I’ve heard and read I like the idea. I actually saw a figure somewhere that speculators may add a total cost of $2.00 per gallon to the price of gasoline at the pump.
    Providing A Gas Tax Holiday To Ease The Burden At The Pump
    This one brought a groan from me when I saw it in the paper this morning. It’s just as dumb and pandering as when crazy John McCain brought it up and a desperate Hillary tried to steal it. As soon as these taxes were removed the price of the gasoline will rise to fill the void, and then what will they do? The gas taxes provide road and infrastructure repair and construction. For a state that’s already as cash strapped as Kentucky now where will this highway and road money come from?
    Also once these taxes were taken out can you imagine the screaming and gnashing of teeth when a desperate state government tries to reinstate them?
    Protecting Consumers
    Again not much benefit. There obviously needs to be(and already is) safeguards in place. If you’re going to go after price gouging take a look at the oil companies themselves and not just the gas stations. When one oil company has profits of $35 billion dollars- just ONE company. Then you need to wander why gas prices must be $4gal and why we can’t also discuss a windfall profits tax? Maybe even returning it to beaten-down consumers as another “stimulus” check.
    In a related note-I’m in a strange perspective where I’m being KILLED by gas prices. I have to drive 30 miles round-trip to work every day, but I also actually believe that there are a few pluses to high prices; More conservation, more mass transit, better fuel economy etc. I won’t discuss this now but I did want to mention it.

    This one I like also. With people desperate for help and relief the oil companies and the Republicans(and a few Democrats) are trying to open up places like ANWR and even more offshore sites for the oil companies to exploit for a benefit that won’t even be felt till years in the future. The oil companies are already sitting on vast areas of leased lands right now.
    Tapping Into Oil Shale Supply
    I’m not a big advocate of this. Maybe as a stop-gap till a sustainable energy plan can be developed and maintained for America.
    Promoting Kentucky Clean Coal As A Vital Part Of America’s Energy Plan
    Once again not a big fan, especially the coal to gas idea. It’s got BIG money behind it but it will be far worse on the environment than what we currently have.
    Moving Towards Alternative And Renewable Energies
    This one is a big winner especially in the long run, which is what we should be aiming at, along with low(er) gas prices. It’s where a BIG chunk of public monies should be invested in because it’s where our children and their children will be living with the consequences.

    All right, that’s my quick(as possible) take on Bruce’s ideas.

  • 3 Sirico // Jul 25, 2008 at 5:23 pm

    Your right on the mark Dean! I couldn’t agree more. Also, according to congressional inquiries:

    - $70/barrel of oil is due to supply and demand.

    - $10/ barrel of oil is due to the falling dollar.

    - the rest is pure speculation (Wall Street manipulation). The real cost of a gal of gas is about $2.30 ish.

    Now that Big Oil has a foothold in Iraq and the presidential election is just around the corner, it’s not surprising that fuel prices are falling.

    I’m a big advocate of closing the “Enron Loophole”.

Leave a Comment