Comments on: BREAKING: Prominent Democrats Pressure Fischer

By: jake

jake — Sun, 04 May 2008 15:28:36 +0000

Harold: It’d be a different story if Fischer had *any* chance to win an election that’s two weeks away.

Fischer is purposefully damaging Lunsford, as he knows fully well that we won’t be receiving the Democratic nod.

So much for party unity.

By: JeffNLou

JeffNLou — Sun, 04 May 2008 15:25:58 +0000

where was that party?

By: Harold

Harold — Sat, 03 May 2008 20:21:57 +0000

Why is Lunsford the new Democratic darling? Everyone put on the kid gloves for him. I love how the unions are supporting him after he dissed them in 2003. How weak can they get.

Has the party fallen this low that a goon like Lunsford is protected from campaign ads against him?
Whats next? I can see McConnell making mince meat of this guy. Its a 70-30 race. Punt!

By: The Dude

The Dude — Fri, 02 May 2008 16:17:48 +0000

I stand corrected. You are absolutley correct that Fischer is most definitley not a newby choad because he signed it. He is a newby choad for all of the stupid other things that he has done wrong…. campaign finance flubs, financial disclosure woes, not going negative earlier, not spending the amount of personal money it would take to raise his name i.d. high enough to be competitive, not having any policy to back up what he says are his priorities, etc.

That being said, I’m probably voting for the butt-nugget anyway.

By: To The Dude

To The Dude — Fri, 02 May 2008 12:51:41 +0000

To The Dude,

You wrote “Fischer was a newby choad for signing this and is rightly getting burned.”

… hey Dude, Can YOU not read. In the letter written to Fischer above, 4th paragraph, the authors wrote, “Of the seven Democratic candidates running for the nomination for U.S. Senate, you were the only candidate to NOT sign that oath.”

… see that Dude, Fischer did NOT sign the oath. Probably because he thinks like you do that “Oaths of Honorable Campaigning” are stupid anyway” and are only designed to “protect the candidate with the most “baggage”, Lunsford.”

I guess NOW you change your mind about Fischer being “rightfully” attacked?

By: Not My Real Name

Not My Real Name — Fri, 02 May 2008 02:17:34 +0000

Why are these people complaining? This is EXACTLY the same thing that your beloved Albert Benjamin Chandler III did to Lunsford the weekend before the 2003 gubernatorial primary. EXACTLY the same thing.

By: briansmith

briansmith — Fri, 02 May 2008 01:57:36 +0000

what’s a bukkake? some sort of fondue?

By: The Dude

The Dude — Thu, 01 May 2008 23:38:55 +0000

Junction Jack, shame on you for knowing the correct spelling and then helping everyone blissfully unaware of the word to be able to google it by giving them the correct spelling. I bet it was people like you that referred to our state’s finest Governor and premiere citizen as “Gov. Felcher”. Now leave this site and get back to watching your 2girls1cup videos and leave the politics to us responsible adults, you degenerate perv.

(Just kidding, of course, Junction Jack…….)

By the way, we all know the other statewide’s names ARE Beshear’s name. Those three ain’t got the guts between ‘em to do something like this without his (at least tacit) approval.

By: junction jack

junction jack — Thu, 01 May 2008 23:24:11 +0000

I CANNOT believe the word bukake (only two k’s for the correct spelling) was used. SHAME! (For those who don’t know what it is … keep it that way. You don’t wanna).

So where’s Beshear’s name on this?

By: dem

dem — Thu, 01 May 2008 23:09:58 +0000

so ask questions what member of the tinkerbell constituancy are u….are u aj or crazy shark fischer is just ruining his chances of ever winning an election again is greg mitches canadate i think so greg needs to drop out and save his money and go back to his house on spring ave