<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Courier-Journal.com Layout Gets Official</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/</link>
	<description>an informed, savvy take on media &#38; politics in Kentucky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:37:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbrauch</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/comment-page-1/#comment-3897</link>
		<dc:creator>tbrauch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/#comment-3897</guid>
		<description>Who cares about the website.  Maybe I&#039;m one of the few people who still read the print version but I want to know what the heck happened to it?  The comics are all f&#039;ed up.  There&#039;s no headings on the columns anymore.  It just looks unfinished to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about the website.  Maybe I&#8217;m one of the few people who still read the print version but I want to know what the heck happened to it?  The comics are all f&#8217;ed up.  There&#8217;s no headings on the columns anymore.  It just looks unfinished to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomason</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/comment-page-1/#comment-3850</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/#comment-3850</guid>
		<description>Design, &#039;look &amp; feel&#039; comes in 2nd place to useablility and navigability.  The old CJ website was the worst, major newspaper website in the U.S.  It was slow, poorly-organized, and just overall minimally useful.
The new version is an improvement, but it&#039;s still way behind most of the other major U.S. newspaper (if the CJ is still in the &#039;major&#039; category).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Design, &#8216;look &amp; feel&#8217; comes in 2nd place to useablility and navigability.  The old CJ website was the worst, major newspaper website in the U.S.  It was slow, poorly-organized, and just overall minimally useful.<br />
The new version is an improvement, but it&#8217;s still way behind most of the other major U.S. newspaper (if the CJ is still in the &#8216;major&#8217; category).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anony Mouse</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/comment-page-1/#comment-3843</link>
		<dc:creator>Anony Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/#comment-3843</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s terrible.  I had trouble finding several of the categories that used to be dominated on the old (and much more aesthetically pleasing page).

Gannett= downfall of print media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s terrible.  I had trouble finding several of the categories that used to be dominated on the old (and much more aesthetically pleasing page).</p>
<p>Gannett= downfall of print media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Magruder (I, not D or R)</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/comment-page-1/#comment-3842</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Magruder (I, not D or R)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/#comment-3842</guid>
		<description>Also meant to say that just because the lettering on the side of the C-J building happens to have been done in green, that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s the newspaper&#039;s colors.

Note that even with the printed, partially color newspaper today, &quot;The Courier-Journal&quot; is printed in black ink, not green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also meant to say that just because the lettering on the side of the C-J building happens to have been done in green, that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s the newspaper&#8217;s colors.</p>
<p>Note that even with the printed, partially color newspaper today, &#8220;The Courier-Journal&#8221; is printed in black ink, not green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Magruder (I, not D or R)</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/comment-page-1/#comment-3841</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Magruder (I, not D or R)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/#comment-3841</guid>
		<description>The city&#039;s colors, as observed in the seal and flag, are what looks to be royal blue and gold.

If they&#039;re in the seal and flag, which were likely approved by the Metro Council, they&#039;re official.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The city&#8217;s colors, as observed in the seal and flag, are what looks to be royal blue and gold.</p>
<p>If they&#8217;re in the seal and flag, which were likely approved by the Metro Council, they&#8217;re official.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bittenbender</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/comment-page-1/#comment-3840</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bittenbender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/#comment-3840</guid>
		<description>Louisville has colors? Didn&#039;t know that. Were they approved by Metro Council or did one of our state lawmakers file a bill designating official colors for the city?

For as long as I can remember, green has always been the C-J&#039;s color. It&#039;s the color of the nameplate on the building. It was the color of the old masthead when the C-J first went to spot color, and you still see the color green in the C-J&#039;s classified advertising.

I haven&#039;t visited the new site enough to register an opinion, but I just hope they don&#039;t bury their blog links like they used to. It took me forever to find the C-J&#039;s blogs, unlike the Herald-Leader or even Cincinnati.com.

Speaking of the C-J, has anybody received a copy of the digital edition? I actually read it online today and I came away impressed with the ease of use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louisville has colors? Didn&#8217;t know that. Were they approved by Metro Council or did one of our state lawmakers file a bill designating official colors for the city?</p>
<p>For as long as I can remember, green has always been the C-J&#8217;s color. It&#8217;s the color of the nameplate on the building. It was the color of the old masthead when the C-J first went to spot color, and you still see the color green in the C-J&#8217;s classified advertising.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t visited the new site enough to register an opinion, but I just hope they don&#8217;t bury their blog links like they used to. It took me forever to find the C-J&#8217;s blogs, unlike the Herald-Leader or even Cincinnati.com.</p>
<p>Speaking of the C-J, has anybody received a copy of the digital edition? I actually read it online today and I came away impressed with the ease of use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/comment-page-1/#comment-3836</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/#comment-3836</guid>
		<description>I hate the new look</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the new look</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Magruder (I, not D or R)</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/comment-page-1/#comment-3835</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Magruder (I, not D or R)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/#comment-3835</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll repeat what I said at The &#039;Ville Voice:



The colors do feel a bit subtle, but what’s worse is that they don’t reflect any of Louisville’s colors, whether in the city seal/flag or its major university.

While the functionality and layout may just involve getting accustomed to, I don’t feel like I’m on a “Louisville site”. I somehow get the notion that this is a Gannett cookie-cutter design. Corporations do indeed have this penchant for trying to make everything the same, in this case, apparently including cities they serve. We’re all the same to them — we’re mere consumers (not citizens who need the information that citizens are supposed to get to make citizen-like decisions and take citizen-like action).

Also, I wonder what they’re going to do with the old forums, full of discussions about various subjects and previous articles. I don’t see any linkage from the new site to the old forums, or any movement of the old content into the new format. Is the C-J going to lose this content (and thus search engine hits) forever, giving local blogs and discussion boards the chance to seize those search hits?

Last, they didn’t migrate old forum accounts into the new one. That’s not really nice to ask people to create new accounts, nor is it practical — The C-J just lost a lot of forum users with this migration. As a forums administrator, I can state that it will take a looooong time to get the previous numbers back. If they don’t plan to migrate the forum users, methinks they’re screwing themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll repeat what I said at The &#8216;Ville Voice:</p>
<p>The colors do feel a bit subtle, but what’s worse is that they don’t reflect any of Louisville’s colors, whether in the city seal/flag or its major university.</p>
<p>While the functionality and layout may just involve getting accustomed to, I don’t feel like I’m on a “Louisville site”. I somehow get the notion that this is a Gannett cookie-cutter design. Corporations do indeed have this penchant for trying to make everything the same, in this case, apparently including cities they serve. We’re all the same to them — we’re mere consumers (not citizens who need the information that citizens are supposed to get to make citizen-like decisions and take citizen-like action).</p>
<p>Also, I wonder what they’re going to do with the old forums, full of discussions about various subjects and previous articles. I don’t see any linkage from the new site to the old forums, or any movement of the old content into the new format. Is the C-J going to lose this content (and thus search engine hits) forever, giving local blogs and discussion boards the chance to seize those search hits?</p>
<p>Last, they didn’t migrate old forum accounts into the new one. That’s not really nice to ask people to create new accounts, nor is it practical — The C-J just lost a lot of forum users with this migration. As a forums administrator, I can state that it will take a looooong time to get the previous numbers back. If they don’t plan to migrate the forum users, methinks they’re screwing themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KYJacob</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/comment-page-1/#comment-3834</link>
		<dc:creator>KYJacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/#comment-3834</guid>
		<description>Awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yellow Dog</title>
		<link>http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/comment-page-1/#comment-3833</link>
		<dc:creator>Yellow Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageonekentucky.com/2008/03/18/new-courier-journalcom-layout-gets-official/#comment-3833</guid>
		<description>All questions, complaints, etc. about the Courier can be answered with one simple phrase:

Gannett sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All questions, complaints, etc. about the Courier can be answered with one simple phrase:</p>
<p>Gannett sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

